Playing Curly Howard in "The Rule of Three" by Eric Lane Barnes

I’m a stymied stooge.

Playing Curly Howard in "The Rule of Three" by Eric Lane Barnes
I got to play a stooge, brilliantly written by Eric Lane Barnes. Now it’s time to stop.

Ugh. So. Ellen and I decided to have a writing night. She’s writing. So far, I haven’t. I felt like my brain was in a good place to write, but I kept overthinking shit. Over periodic cigarettes, I’d start writing things in my head. Bad, bad, bad. I do some of my best work-related thinking while smoking—code that’s been plaguing me will suddenly come clear. But writing-related thinking? Not so much. In the categorization of writers as slashers and bashers, I am indisputably a slasher. I cannot edit while I’m writing (at least not much). I have to let the shit hit the page as fast as possible, or I will overwrite the hell out of everything, and it will suck great big donkey balls. And… and this is the worst part… and if I let myself think too much about the writing, I will also be overcome by the knowledge that it will suck great big donkey balls.

And, for the most part, I don’t mind my writing sucking great big donkey balls. From time to time. It’s necessary. To get to the teeny-tiny percentage of writing that I genuinely like, I have to write a fair amount of equine-fellating shit (why does my auto-correct not like fellating? Fellate me, auto-correct; it doesn’t recognize fellate, either, but fellatio? it’s all good… wtf? Side note to that as well: best usenet post ever: “What the fuck is WTF?!” Whee. I’m off on tangents).

Almost a couple decades ago, when I was writing a lot without any thought toward getting published, I took a bit of advice from one of Natalie Goldberg’s books about letting one’s internal editor have his say on the page: if your internal editor is telling you that you suck, write that down. My internal editor’s voice, when transferred to the page, happened to sound a lot like Ross Perot. Cracked me the hell up every time I wrote down his “What the hell, son? Dad gum it, you can’t write that,” etc. It made it a hell of a lot easier to dismiss this voice, since it was so insanely moronic. Maybe I need to invite that little sumbitch back in again. Just write his idiocy and let that particular bit of writing be part of the necessary shit pile.

So… good. Okay. I’m just writing down a bunch of words as they occur to me. Good. “Law & Order: Los Angeles” starts in about seven minutes, though (if we remember our teevee schedules correctly), so we’re going to go in and watch that. So. I won’t be getting to “real” writing tonight. Hell, this isn’t even of much value as a blog post.

But here’s what I was thinking of when I sat down to start writing in this here WordPress window: that whole question of how improv affects my writing. I still don’t know. I’m not writing anything other than a blog post. In theory, it should be helping me to slash away, and toss away the inevitable detritus. But here’s what I did this weekend just past (on night one, I played Curly Howard; on night two, I played a weasel, an old goat, and a German Shepard mix). And I was thinking: maybe because I got to perform two god-damned AMAZING scripts this weekend, both of which were written overnight… maybe because of that, I’m letting myself be intimidated by other people’s really, really, really good writing. (I plan to write more about 14/48 soon.)

But as I sit here typing this out, I know that’s bullshit. Not bullshit that they were amazing—they were. Holy shit, they were. Bullshit that I’m intimidated. Truth is, I’m totally inspired in just about every working neuron. Bullshit, because I’m allowing myself to be a) lazy, and b) intimidated by my own internal editor. The first pisses me off because: fuck you, Dave, stop being lazy. The second pisses me off because: fuck you, Dave, you know that little Ross Perot inside is an idiot.

So… yeah. I need to strap myself back in again. I know I have a lot of bad writing to get out. I always do. But I’d like to think that I have some good writing to get out, too, and that’s not going to happen unless I allow myself to do the bad writing, and move the fuck on.

3 thoughts on “I’m a stymied stooge.”

  1. Ehhh, it happens some days. Sux when it does. Try again tomorrow. Or better yet, I always do my best writing when I’m procrastinating about something else.

  2. Should I be insulted that you were writing right alongside of me (i mean, your room is next to mine) and you WERE NOT THE SLIGHTEST BIT INTIMIDATED????? Maybe because you know I work slow. If someone gave me a script to write overnight, I would put down, like, ten lines of dialogue. Even then, I’d be tweaking it. I’d be like, Ohhhhh, I dunnnoooooo, Is this really what I want to sayyyyyy? (All whiny.) Although maybe I wouldn’t. Maybe I would rise to the challenge. There’s something to be said for very strict time constraints. Do or die. It’s like, You better produce or you’ll get a giant FAIL. So I think, in my terror, I would produce. How can you create those conditions artificially, though? Maybe that’s why you like improv (and I would hate it)–because the audience is there, the lights are up, and you better as hell do something worth watching or yo ass is grass.

  3. I hope you’re not insulted, because I quickly realized that my thinking I was intimidated by other writers was total bullshit. It was 100% my own garbage.

    With writing, I’m not sure how to artificially create those conditions. It’s the old “write 250 a day” thing, making oneself beholden to one’s own conditions. At times, that’s worked well for me, but I haven’t successfully imposed that on myself in quite a while. And even when I DID impose it on myself, I tried to do it alongside other people so that I felt a sense of responsibility to others as well.

    I think you’d actually produce an amazing script under the constraints, largely because you’re so good at editing as you go. I’d be less sure of myself, because my editing process doesn’t begin in earnest until I’ve had time away from the writing and the ability to come back to it with a more neutral eye.

Comments are closed.